🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.